A Man For All Seasons :: essays research papers

A "Man for All Seasons" is about a art object so subtle and saintly that an actor who takes on the division must be able to project an to the highest degree superhuman presence. As is evident, the story is based on the life of Sir Thomas more than, man of matinee idol and chancellor to the court of Henry VIII. The year is 1530 and from what I know, actors in this depiction typically wear transparent half-masks and double up on roles.More was the only member of Henry VIIIs government who would not be seduced or corrupted by Henrys threats. When the king asked More to sign an oath establishing the monarchy as head of the Church of England, More refused. He could not alter the law, he said. As the play progresses and More loses his wealth and even his freedom, he becomes al near self-righteous in his strict adherence to the law. Exasperating, but he must remain sympathetic as his family goes down with him into grief and poverty. The man who plays him must show both his affectionate disposition and his unshakable piety or the script would be just an exercise in mouthing lines.What I saying from the story was how the wheels turn in Mores mind, the glowof warmth and the bleakness of intrustlessness that flicker across his face. It is not enough to paint him as a man. He must be a man among grovelers and syncophants, a rise presence. A man for all seasons, in other words.In most cases, I am compelled to say that one probably would not be able to successfully preserve their integrity in a occurrence such as Thomas Mores. But in response to the distrust of whether or not a man can reasonably hope to do so, I believe that Mores behavioral response exemplifies a irrefutable confirmation of such.Even if it could not be reasonably expected for a man to maintain his integrity when consistently faced with such a dilemma, it would probably be asserted that such was understandable. Somewhat indirectly, this case reminds me of wayfaring and Platonic disc ussions of virtue and the nature of man. Some philosophers would probably insist that man